Dhiraj Dixit
About AirdropBuzz

Dhiraj Dixit, building a research-first edge for airdrop hunters

I run AirdropBuzz so everyday users can discover, prioritize, and complete high-signal airdrops without getting buried under hype, bad links, or vague instructions.

Manual research No pay-to-shill Step-by-step guides Risk-first scoring
Research first Docs, traction, incentives, and user effort get reviewed before anything is published.
Safety focused Official links, fresh-wallet reminders, and obvious red flags are part of every workflow.
Built for clarity Tasks are translated into practical checklists instead of jargon-heavy threads.
Updated actively Guides change as campaigns add quests, chains, timelines, and snapshot signals.

Why I built AirdropBuzz

Airdrop info is noisy, fast-changing, and often risky. I created AirdropBuzz to do the hard part: vetting projects, surfacing only what is worth your time, and translating complicated quests into clear, repeatable steps that do not assume you live on Crypto Twitter all day.

The goal is simple: help users make better decisions with less guesswork. That means separating signal from hype, highlighting what is actually worth doing, and making sure people understand the tradeoffs before connecting a wallet or spending time on a campaign.

What makes this site different

Signal over noise

Team, on-chain traction, community health, and product velocity are weighed together so weak campaigns get filtered out early.

Clear, step-by-step guides

Every guide is structured around prerequisites, tasks, timelines, and risk notes in plain English.

Potential Score

A simple scoring framework blends fundamentals, community momentum, and market context so you can prioritize faster.

User safety first

Official links, fresh-wallet reminders, and obvious red flags are called out inside each walkthrough.

What readers should expect Honest prioritization, direct language, and no pretending every campaign is worth your time.
What projects should expect No free hype. If something is featured, it still has to hold up under user-first scrutiny.
What I optimize for Clarity, trust, and usefulness over volume. Better to publish fewer strong guides than flood the site with weak ones.

How we work

Our Potential Score is a signals-based framework and is not a guarantee.

Learn more in our Editorial Policy and how we score airdrops.

How I research

  • Scan roadmaps, docs, product surfaces, and on-chain data to understand the actual use case and distribution design.
  • Score team credibility, token hints, user incentives, community quality, and security posture before recommending attention.
  • Write concise runbooks with checkpoints, official links, estimated effort, and realistic expectations around reward timing.
  • Update guides when campaigns add quests, snapshots, new chains, or meaningful signs that change the opportunity.

Editorial principles

  • Research before hype: listings and rumors are never enough.
  • Safety over speed: clear separation of official links, warnings on risky contracts, and fresh-wallet prompts.
  • No pay-to-shill: sponsored work is rare, labeled, and must be useful.
  • Plain language: no jargon without context, no buried instructions.

Work with me

If you are a founder, researcher, or community lead and need a rigorous, user-first guide, reach out. I collaborate on walkthroughs, safety reviews, product feedback, and research-led educational pages. No soft promises, no hidden ads.

Elsewhere